The article describes one of the methods of live (or in-play) trading that exploits the statistics of match draws. The method can be successfully used in the football betting sector, where draws are highly unpredictable but occur in 25-30% of the matches. Laying the draw is among the simplest Betfair trading systems that guarantee profits regardless of the outcome. The best part is that the strategy is completely legit, since unlike ordinary bookmakers, Betfair has a financial interest in your success.
We assume that you’ve carefully read Betfair Trading tutorial, which illustrates the basics of trading on the world’s largest betting exchange platform. We also assume that you already have a Betfair account. If you still don’t, now it’s a good time to sign up – the tutorial will be much easier to understand if you have an unlimited access to Betfair trading platform.
To quickly demonstrate how lay the draw strategy works, let’s take a Friendly International match between England and Ghana. On Betfair head on to Football ? Coupons ? {Day} In-Play Coupon as shown in the screenshot below.

On the In-Play Coupon page you’ll find three columns stating the market’s back and lay odds for three possible outcomes. The left column corresponds to the home win odds; the middle column shows the draw odds; and the right column shows the away win odds. The rows show the upcoming matches and you’ll have to decide which game to pick. Your choice is crucial, since the success of laying the draw system depends on proper selection of the games. Later on, we’ll describe how to pick the games wisely.
After selecting the games, the next obvious step is to decide upon the lay stake. The pre-kick lay odds in the game between England and Ghana were 4.2 at the time this tutorial was written and we laid £100 on draw. Once the match started and England scored its first goal, the back odds increased to 7.4. Then, we backed the draw with a stake of £60.

Can you feel the magic? If a draw occurs, your profit will be £60•(7.4-1) – £100•(4.2-1) = £64, and if one of the teams wins, your profit will be £100 – £60 = £40. That’s arbitrage – one way or another, you profit.
Picking the right games is crucial for lay the draw system. The right game to trade is a game whose chances for final score 0-0 are very low and the draw-lay odds are somewhere between 4.1 and 4.8. It might sound complicated, but the truth is, that finding such a game is easy if you know where to look.
Many online resources provide you with free predictions of the expected scores. Ideally, you should pick games whose expected scores are far from 0:0, i.e. 2:2, 3:2, 3:3 etc. However, be careful as long as you don’t know the exact probability of the expected score. Statistics is tricky, and many resources will simply show you the outcome with the highest probability, while hiding the fact that the difference between the probability of score 3:3 and score 0:0 is very low.
Actually, you don’t need the expected score. Instead, you can deduce the probability of score 0:0 by a cross-validation of three independent factors. The following should hold for an ideal game:
SciBet is among the few betting tips resources that provide a wealth of information on the upcoming football events. It serves as our quick, one stop information source for lay the draw system.

On the main page, you may see horizontal bars with 1×2 probabilities. Just hover over one of them, and you’ll see the exact numbers. Clicking on one of the games will take you to the game page where the probability of total under/over 2.5 score and the defensive/attacking skills of the teams are presented as shown on the screenshot above.
Lay the draw system is based on the assumption that at least one goal is scored during the game. Otherwise, the draw-back odds will never increase. For such cases, a loss reducing exit strategy (hedging) is required. One of the two operations below will ensure you never risk the entire stake.
The strategy is simple and perfectly suited for football market. It can be implemented in various ways, but the basic steps are as follows:
A good strategy is a strategy that has multiple exit opportunities, and laying the draw certainly falls under the above category. However, laying the draw is not the only football system out there, and if you’re seriously into footbal trading, Mark Andrews’ new product, which covers 10 Betfair football strategies, is the way to go.
I do like your approach to the old LTD system and in fact use SCIBET myself when assessing trades; however in backing 0-0 is sure enough safer but if the dog scores 1st the odds often decrease on the draw causing loss on both MO & CS markets. Far better to enter the market after H/T when most LTD traders are twitching to accept a loss. Further by laying the draw you are actually backing both teams to win and if your research indicates a strong win for the fave why back the dog to win as well?
I developed a method incorporated into a spreadsheet which determines the liability on laying the draw & indicates the amount to back the fave for majority of profit with an amount to back the dog as cover.
Unfortunately this method is still susceptible to the dreaded 0-0 but overall has more ROI over long term.
“Beat The Dog” is for my own personal use but I am sure anyone can produce a similar method with workbook that is superior to LTD.
Hello, Fox.
The formula is correct. Think of it this way.. ignore the back stake for a moment and assume that you only laid £100 on draw with odds 4.2.
Meanwhile, on the other side of the planet someone matched your bet and backed the draw with £100. If the draw happens, that person on the other side of the planet will earn £100•(4.2-1) and this is the exact amount you’re going to lose.
Hope that helps.
#6 – Peter, Can you give an indication of what prob a team needs to become a dog in your sheet?
Keep having the dog team score first and have had to nervously wait for them to score more than 1 for the draw odds to go up. If they don’t, cut your losses time, and I’ve rather just be looking at three small green numbers at the end of the day!
Hello
Im really impressed of your strategy but isn’t it better to choose a match where the odds are almost the same? So when a team scores the back odd for a draw always rise. And you will be always in profit. With your strategy when the dog scores the back odd doesn’t rise much.
Is this a better strategy?
Sorry for my bad English.
This doesnt work. For instance, if I put £100 lay on 3.5 odds to draw before game, then a team scores the back odds are around 5, so i put £60 on 5/1. So 60 x (5-1) – 100 x (3.5-1) = -£10. So i lose £10 if its a draw, and win £40 if a team wins. Ive tried this 3 times and lost money when its a draw!?
conkers,
betfair system is trying to say that it is not always the same stake of 100 then 60.. you need to work out the back odds so you do profit, if the back odds for the draw rise above the lay odds for the draw which is your first bet then you cant lose.. this goes for any sport… if you can back at a higher price than a lay you win, simple.
Hi again, ive got to know this strategy a little better, ive found that when you need to trade out at around 2.0 (as there are no goals yet) then you lose fairly bigtime. Say I have a few good games and am in profit, then all it takes is 1 bad game where there are no goals (which happens a fair bit) if you let the game go on till the end and its still a draw then you lose massive, you can trade out when the draw bet is 2.0 and you dont lose as much but still lose a fair bit, thus knocking you back bigtime! Its also a nightmare when the underdog scores first.
Conkers, I know how you feel. It’s all going really well and the winning game build then it all goes wrong.
For me choosing the right games has been most important. And deciding how long to leave the trade open before exiting to stop loses.
If the loses are stopped short profits from winning trade outweigh the loses.
Interestingly, the odds for the favorite increase at almost the exact same rate as the draw odds decrease. But if the fav scores first it’s odds will decrease by almost exactly twice as much as the draw odds will increase. So if you lay the fav and back the draw before game starts and then trade them both out after some time has passed with no goal you profit on both and if the fav scores before you trade out you can still trade them both out and only lose half as much on the draw as on the fav. You have to be pretty sure that the fav will score first though because if the dog scores first you will lose on both bets. I haven’t actually tried it. I just noticed that fact about the odds movements using BetAngel’s Soccer Mystic odds simulator. You can see it on youtube in the soccer betting vids by “betangel”. So you would want a game where the fav is the home team and significantly more likely to score first.
Actually, it might work better to lay both the draw and the fav then if the fav scores first you will make more on the fav bet than you lose on the draw bet if you trade both out right after the goal. If there is no goal when it’s getting close to the end of the game then you should be able to trade both out and come out close to even since the fav odds went up at the same rate as the draw odds went down. If the dog scored first then both Draw and fav odds would increase and you would profit from both.
I want to get into this a little more and have been dipping my toe into this strategy. However, this strategy is all about someone scoring first then laying the odds there after as we know… Can someone explain why you wouldnt just bet on at least one goal scored pre-match and bin off laying altogether? Or even just backing the fave to score first?
You can scientifically analyse the statistics until you are blue in the face. In my opinion, this is a crap strategy for various reasons. In order to make money out of this, one or more of the odds have to be wrong. I understand that many many years ago, there was an over-reaction in the market when a goal was scored – but surely if you just backed the draw at this point, you would have made money, as this is the market error. You can suggest picking games that are unlikely to finish 0-0, but the chances of a match finishing 0-0 is reflected in the odds already. If you believe from looking at sci-bet that the market is wrong and a goal is much more likely than the odds in betfair show, then why not simply lay 0-0? MAJOR problems occur also if the underdogs score first and the likelyhood of a draw increase. To make money, there has to be a mistake in the market somewhere. This system is so old and so well known. Do you honestly think that if this was making any money, people would be sharing this knowledge? I think this is a publicity stunt from betfair to get foolish people to trade and increase their revenues.
More observational than hard research – the system suggests hedging at 0-0 to minimse potential losses, however this assumes that the probability of a draw increases proportionally over time. I appreciate that this is how the exchanges generally behave but the reality is there are more goals scored in the last 30mins than the first 30mins. This looks like an opportunity to enter this market at 60/75 minutes when 0-0 and the odds of a draw are now <2.00. A goal at that stage would provide significant arbitrage profits ("green book") and should the game end 0-0, the losses are no greater than the "closed" bet in the original example.
23:55
Wow, thanks guys! Excellent tutorial, when will you be releasing the horse racing one?